america's GEOENGINEERING WEAPON
in 70+ years
what have they done to our planet earth?
This article is intended to give basic background on the AMERICAN government’s quest to control the weather through a process that they have recently called “geoengineering,” but was originally called “weather modification.” They are one and the same processes that vary only with scale, with the Cambridge dictionary listing geoengineering as “the study and activity of finding ways to change the earth's atmosphere in order to reduce global warming.” That statement is deficient at best, and is indicative of the real problem that is the source of the desire for geoengineering, Climate Change, which I will touch on shortly. A much more accurate definition of geoengineering is from Britannica, “Geoengineering, the large-scale manipulation of a specific process central to controlling Earth’s climate for the purpose of obtaining a specific benefit.” Britannica’s definition is the most correct because geoengineering can have a wide range of effects and outcomes on earths climate, from both a micro and macro perspective. The key consideration of this process is the duration of the intended outcomes; geoengineering’s goals are to control weather processes over extended durations. When we consider its sibling, Weather Modification, which was our government’s original foray into manipulating weather, we are dealing with primarily short ranged, but localized and regional effects on weather systems. Weather Modification involves the intentional manipulation of our planet’s natural processes such as rain, drought, heat, cold, snow, clouds, or sunshine in a specific geographic area for a predetermined duration. However, both Weather Modification and geoengineering involve intentional manipulations of earth’s essential systems such as its biota, (all plants and animal life in general) , our hydrosphere, lithosphere, and atmosphere - perhaps from our innermost troposphere to the exosphere; it is all connected. Both Weather Modification and geoengineering aim to use human science to change earth’s natural processes to fit one group’s desired outcomes for a specific region. They believe that they have the ability, and the right to make earth’s weather, and over the long term, earth’s climate fit their vision of the ideal world, and their determination of what is best for the entire planet.
Back to the global warming mentioned in the previous paragraph. Contrary to popular indications, global warming, A.K.A., Climate Change, Climate Crisis, or whatever alarmist label that is applied next to captivate the interest of the fully programmed, none of these propaganda terms are part of a recognized religion. Although, if one were to stand outside this sphere of madness, it would be difficult to distinguish Climate Change from religion, since climate change is based on belief and a very selective set of facts. Information that resides outside of the standard or accepted set of facts are disregarded or ignored altogether. Climate change, which began its life as Global Warming, is an established belief that our planet is warming as a consequence of unintended human activities. Weather Modification and geoengineering are when the government is dumping substances into the atmosphere, or by utilizing electromagnetic and other processes, it plans to manipulate our eco system to deliberately change the weather, and as a long-term consequence, our climate. I will handle the Climate Change lie in a separate article.
When most think of weather modification, a two-word controversy comes to mind; chemtrails vs contrails. This is a diversionary false dilemma because we have been programmed to lock onto an unwinnable argument of “what do we see,” with a government propagandist’s skillfully entrenched argument of, “ Are the straight lines of puffy cloud looking material that trails behind aircraft a result of aircraft engine exhaust, or is the government spraying the skies?” Absent of a very brave whistle blower, it is a nearly impossible argument to prove beyond some reasonable doubt, which is why it has been manipulated into this diversionary false dilemma. The question that this diversionary tactic seeks to avoid is a simple one. “Has the US GOVERNMENT now, or in the past, ever used arial vehicles to spray or release substances into our atmosphere with the goal of modifying the weather”. On that question, the answer is an unequivocal and absolute yes, it has. For that reason, highly creative and skillful propagandist have kept the arguments on, “What do you see?” rather than “What are they doing?”
Back to the global warming mentioned in the previous paragraph. Contrary to popular indications, global warming, A.K.A., Climate Change, Climate Crisis, or whatever alarmist label that is applied next to captivate the interest of the fully programmed, none of these propaganda terms are part of a recognized religion. Although, if one were to stand outside this sphere of madness, it would be difficult to distinguish Climate Change from religion, since climate change is based on belief and a very selective set of facts. Information that resides outside of the standard or accepted set of facts are disregarded or ignored altogether. Climate change, which began its life as Global Warming, is an established belief that our planet is warming as a consequence of unintended human activities. Weather Modification and geoengineering are when the government is dumping substances into the atmosphere, or by utilizing electromagnetic and other processes, it plans to manipulate our eco system to deliberately change the weather, and as a long-term consequence, our climate. I will handle the Climate Change lie in a separate article.
When most think of weather modification, a two-word controversy comes to mind; chemtrails vs contrails. This is a diversionary false dilemma because we have been programmed to lock onto an unwinnable argument of “what do we see,” with a government propagandist’s skillfully entrenched argument of, “ Are the straight lines of puffy cloud looking material that trails behind aircraft a result of aircraft engine exhaust, or is the government spraying the skies?” Absent of a very brave whistle blower, it is a nearly impossible argument to prove beyond some reasonable doubt, which is why it has been manipulated into this diversionary false dilemma. The question that this diversionary tactic seeks to avoid is a simple one. “Has the US GOVERNMENT now, or in the past, ever used arial vehicles to spray or release substances into our atmosphere with the goal of modifying the weather”. On that question, the answer is an unequivocal and absolute yes, it has. For that reason, highly creative and skillful propagandist have kept the arguments on, “What do you see?” rather than “What are they doing?”
The controversy over chemtrails vs contrails had been a topic that I steered clear of until recently when I began to discover the sheer magnitude of the government’s efforts to manipulate earth’s ecosystems. There is so much information saturating the web that I perceive to be disinformation, based purely on what I understand about the modes and practices of the disinformation apparatus, that I steered clear of the subject at first. Yet, after a few more months of discovery, I was drawn back to it because it fits so neatly into the package that is “Control,” the watchword for the American Matrix. Secondly, once I read the Report From Iron Mountain: On The Possibility and Desirability of Peace, I gained both a renewed interest in the subject of weather modification, and a clearer understanding of how it fits firmly into the processes that form their long-range planning apparatus.
According to NASA, “Since the late 1940s, scientists have known that silver iodide introduced into a cloud with super-cooled water droplets led to the formation of ice crystals”, and those ice crystals under the right circumstances can result in precipitation or at least increased cloud size. This is called cloud seeding. But by the 1960s, no one had figured out exactly how to control the processes that leads to how clouds behaved after being seeded. Early work with silver iodide dispersion into clouds produced mixed results that did not allow even the operators with the most free-wheeling use of supportive language to say that their results were consistent. In the private sector however, that did not stop desperate farmers from falling prey to salesman with seriously hyperbolic sales pitches who sold them the promise of rain during the sometimes long droughts of the American southwest.
According to NASA, “Since the late 1940s, scientists have known that silver iodide introduced into a cloud with super-cooled water droplets led to the formation of ice crystals”, and those ice crystals under the right circumstances can result in precipitation or at least increased cloud size. This is called cloud seeding. But by the 1960s, no one had figured out exactly how to control the processes that leads to how clouds behaved after being seeded. Early work with silver iodide dispersion into clouds produced mixed results that did not allow even the operators with the most free-wheeling use of supportive language to say that their results were consistent. In the private sector however, that did not stop desperate farmers from falling prey to salesman with seriously hyperbolic sales pitches who sold them the promise of rain during the sometimes long droughts of the American southwest.
In a document entitled: Aims And Activities of the U.S. Advisory Committee on Weather Control, by Captain Howard T. Orville, USN, retired, Capt Orville formulated an early plan for advancing U.S. efforts toward an organized weather modification program.
Capt Orville wrote:
“The Advisory Committee on Weather Control appointed by President Eisenhower in December 1953 is now conducting an exhaustive study to determine how the nation's economy can obtain the greatest benefit from rain making or weather modification.
The Committee was established by legislation passed last session of Congress after a careful study over a period of three years by several committees of the Senate and the House of Representatives.”
Capt Orville went on to say:
“The bill was signed by President Eisenhower on August 13, 1953, and became Public Law 256. The President has since appointed (December 9th), and the Senate confirmed (January 25th), the members composed of five members from private life and six members to represent interested government departments. These latter consist of the Under Secretaries of Commerce and Interior, Assistant Secretaries of Defense and Agriculture, the Surgeon General and the Director, National Science Foundation.”
So, from a hodgepodge of government agencies who were conducting their own experiments under department level programs since the launch of Project CIRRUS in the spring of 1947, a new organization of nationally controlled programs would soon be consolidated under one national plan for weather modification, with strategic, commercial, and military deployment applications. The goals of the early meeting of this newly formed committee was, “a complete study and evaluation of public and private experiments in weather control for the purpose of determining the extent to which the United States should experiment with, engage in, or regulate activities designed to control weather conditions."
The national level program got off to a spotty start, but the Government began to take seriously its preliminary studies in the early half of the 1960s. Project Stormfury was one of those early weather modification experiments. It launched in 1961, a process where early experimenters would hitch rides on aircraft missions, they would eject flares using chutes, the flares would ignite to create silver iodide smoke, and thus dispersed silver iodide into selected clouds. The clouds responded just as their cloud model predicted, which gave them early hopes of success. From that point, “Stormfury’s primary objective was to test a hypothesis that a hurricane’s maximum winds could be weakened by about 10 percent”. The results were mixed, but the fever had made its way into the entire body of the patient at that point, The National Weather Bureau, that subsequently was renamed the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, or NOAA, and they were hooked. The ability to change the weather was power, a level of control that had never been sensed since the beginning of human history. The powers that control our Government wanted it, and they could not afford for popular opinion to divert them from that path.
As the trail leads, it appears that the National Weather Modification program began operating in plain sight, but hiding in the shadows whenever anyone looked or questioned, from that point forward. I have a clear paper trail from the 1950s to the 1990s. The popular term changed to geoengineering internally, but geoengineering was used sparingly in the early 2000s until recently as the systems were moved to secret satellites in space, away from the prying eyes of everyday citizens who only have to live with their results. A casual internet search will net clear evidence of open discussions about weather modification from the 1950s onward, and of geoengineering as late as the current 2020s. The attached document is indicative of highly revealing documentation that is available on the web; but there are many others. Technological developments gained over the last five-decades likely yielded an impressive capability at manipulating weather over U.S. territories, or presumably through the use of elevated orbiting platforms, the modification capability over any micro-climate, or macro-climate system on the globe.
This is just one federal document of many, A Recommended National Program In Weather Modification, but it provides an undeniable consolidated link to the U.S. Weather Modification Programs. I have highlighted some interesting aspects inside the documents, which includes ominous code-names like Project Skyfire, Storm Fury, and Hailswath.
These programs were big ticket research, with at least $382 MILLION dollars allocated in the first three-years. To put that into 2021 perspective, $382 MILLION dollars in 1968 would be worth about $2.9 BILLION in 2021 dollars. If those were allocated today, it would be more than the $2.87 billion that the current Congress allocated for the entire Public Housing Capital Fund, which is used to provide housing for underprivileged Americans today. Perhaps a better way to imagine the astounding expenditure that was $382 MILLION, the median price of a home in America was $24,700 in 1968. If you look at what our government is telling us about their gains in the ability to manipulate weather, after perhaps Trillions of dollars expended since then, they are constantly telling us that the only way we save our planet is to cut greenhouse gasses. Yet, with speeches on geoengineering as late as 2020 to my own knowledge, either they are NOT telling us something, or there has been a HUGE transfer of US funds to research for over 70 YEARS with nothing to show for it, or are perhaps both potential outcomes true at the same time? You decide which situation is most likely.
In line with typical public knowledge, as the American people have been fed bread-crumbs about the Government’s efforts to manipulate earth’s climate, they always have presented the “potential” of these programs with a positive spin, highlighting the value of these important programs to the welfare of everyday Americans. One thing is for certain however, and it was included in results of earlier experimentation and that is, research into how to produce rain, could yield results that limit rain. Research on how to lower temperatures, could yield climate responses that ultimately increase temperatures. It is all a matter of the goals, objectives, means, and methods deployed at the time, and even years or decades after research results were recorded, adverse consequences could still be realized.
Humans have been playing God since at least 1947, pumping chemicals and electrical waves into a dynamic system that they have demonstrated that they do not understand. Auroras and polar vortexes demonstrate the poorly understood and dynamic connection between earth’s atmosphere and elements and processes that exist in the outer reaches of earth’s atmosphere, even into outer space. How could a human induced alteration of the connection between extraterrestrial forces such as charged gases change the way earth’s atmosphere behaves, a question that can be directly and easily related to recent prolonged changes to our polar vortex. We look to the sky and see sprites and auroras, while we amaze at their beauty and ponder their connection to our world. Then we consider the charged plasma that we call lightning, which connects our planet with the atmosphere and our atmosphere with outer space as they explode above earth about 100 times every second, which is about 8 million times per day, and ask, is there a connection between this charged plasma, our perfectly synchronized pale blue planet, and the universe’s own cycle of creation and destruction? For the aware, these things remind us that modern science has no idea how our complex eco system works, not even after over 70 years and trillions of dollars spent trying to manipulate it. Did they succeed? What are the results of their experiments on the only planet that we have?
What is absolutely clear however, is that since 1953, the United States has been serious and determined to move forward with its intentions to modify earth’s climate, and as evidence suggest, that has not changed in the years that followed. What have they done already? Why do we have “Climate Change”? The one indisputable fact about all of this is, someone is playing God, and the rest of us get to live, or die with the consequences of their actions.
Capt Orville wrote:
“The Advisory Committee on Weather Control appointed by President Eisenhower in December 1953 is now conducting an exhaustive study to determine how the nation's economy can obtain the greatest benefit from rain making or weather modification.
The Committee was established by legislation passed last session of Congress after a careful study over a period of three years by several committees of the Senate and the House of Representatives.”
Capt Orville went on to say:
“The bill was signed by President Eisenhower on August 13, 1953, and became Public Law 256. The President has since appointed (December 9th), and the Senate confirmed (January 25th), the members composed of five members from private life and six members to represent interested government departments. These latter consist of the Under Secretaries of Commerce and Interior, Assistant Secretaries of Defense and Agriculture, the Surgeon General and the Director, National Science Foundation.”
So, from a hodgepodge of government agencies who were conducting their own experiments under department level programs since the launch of Project CIRRUS in the spring of 1947, a new organization of nationally controlled programs would soon be consolidated under one national plan for weather modification, with strategic, commercial, and military deployment applications. The goals of the early meeting of this newly formed committee was, “a complete study and evaluation of public and private experiments in weather control for the purpose of determining the extent to which the United States should experiment with, engage in, or regulate activities designed to control weather conditions."
The national level program got off to a spotty start, but the Government began to take seriously its preliminary studies in the early half of the 1960s. Project Stormfury was one of those early weather modification experiments. It launched in 1961, a process where early experimenters would hitch rides on aircraft missions, they would eject flares using chutes, the flares would ignite to create silver iodide smoke, and thus dispersed silver iodide into selected clouds. The clouds responded just as their cloud model predicted, which gave them early hopes of success. From that point, “Stormfury’s primary objective was to test a hypothesis that a hurricane’s maximum winds could be weakened by about 10 percent”. The results were mixed, but the fever had made its way into the entire body of the patient at that point, The National Weather Bureau, that subsequently was renamed the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, or NOAA, and they were hooked. The ability to change the weather was power, a level of control that had never been sensed since the beginning of human history. The powers that control our Government wanted it, and they could not afford for popular opinion to divert them from that path.
As the trail leads, it appears that the National Weather Modification program began operating in plain sight, but hiding in the shadows whenever anyone looked or questioned, from that point forward. I have a clear paper trail from the 1950s to the 1990s. The popular term changed to geoengineering internally, but geoengineering was used sparingly in the early 2000s until recently as the systems were moved to secret satellites in space, away from the prying eyes of everyday citizens who only have to live with their results. A casual internet search will net clear evidence of open discussions about weather modification from the 1950s onward, and of geoengineering as late as the current 2020s. The attached document is indicative of highly revealing documentation that is available on the web; but there are many others. Technological developments gained over the last five-decades likely yielded an impressive capability at manipulating weather over U.S. territories, or presumably through the use of elevated orbiting platforms, the modification capability over any micro-climate, or macro-climate system on the globe.
This is just one federal document of many, A Recommended National Program In Weather Modification, but it provides an undeniable consolidated link to the U.S. Weather Modification Programs. I have highlighted some interesting aspects inside the documents, which includes ominous code-names like Project Skyfire, Storm Fury, and Hailswath.
These programs were big ticket research, with at least $382 MILLION dollars allocated in the first three-years. To put that into 2021 perspective, $382 MILLION dollars in 1968 would be worth about $2.9 BILLION in 2021 dollars. If those were allocated today, it would be more than the $2.87 billion that the current Congress allocated for the entire Public Housing Capital Fund, which is used to provide housing for underprivileged Americans today. Perhaps a better way to imagine the astounding expenditure that was $382 MILLION, the median price of a home in America was $24,700 in 1968. If you look at what our government is telling us about their gains in the ability to manipulate weather, after perhaps Trillions of dollars expended since then, they are constantly telling us that the only way we save our planet is to cut greenhouse gasses. Yet, with speeches on geoengineering as late as 2020 to my own knowledge, either they are NOT telling us something, or there has been a HUGE transfer of US funds to research for over 70 YEARS with nothing to show for it, or are perhaps both potential outcomes true at the same time? You decide which situation is most likely.
In line with typical public knowledge, as the American people have been fed bread-crumbs about the Government’s efforts to manipulate earth’s climate, they always have presented the “potential” of these programs with a positive spin, highlighting the value of these important programs to the welfare of everyday Americans. One thing is for certain however, and it was included in results of earlier experimentation and that is, research into how to produce rain, could yield results that limit rain. Research on how to lower temperatures, could yield climate responses that ultimately increase temperatures. It is all a matter of the goals, objectives, means, and methods deployed at the time, and even years or decades after research results were recorded, adverse consequences could still be realized.
Humans have been playing God since at least 1947, pumping chemicals and electrical waves into a dynamic system that they have demonstrated that they do not understand. Auroras and polar vortexes demonstrate the poorly understood and dynamic connection between earth’s atmosphere and elements and processes that exist in the outer reaches of earth’s atmosphere, even into outer space. How could a human induced alteration of the connection between extraterrestrial forces such as charged gases change the way earth’s atmosphere behaves, a question that can be directly and easily related to recent prolonged changes to our polar vortex. We look to the sky and see sprites and auroras, while we amaze at their beauty and ponder their connection to our world. Then we consider the charged plasma that we call lightning, which connects our planet with the atmosphere and our atmosphere with outer space as they explode above earth about 100 times every second, which is about 8 million times per day, and ask, is there a connection between this charged plasma, our perfectly synchronized pale blue planet, and the universe’s own cycle of creation and destruction? For the aware, these things remind us that modern science has no idea how our complex eco system works, not even after over 70 years and trillions of dollars spent trying to manipulate it. Did they succeed? What are the results of their experiments on the only planet that we have?
What is absolutely clear however, is that since 1953, the United States has been serious and determined to move forward with its intentions to modify earth’s climate, and as evidence suggest, that has not changed in the years that followed. What have they done already? Why do we have “Climate Change”? The one indisputable fact about all of this is, someone is playing God, and the rest of us get to live, or die with the consequences of their actions.