Geoengineering - Has weather been weaponized
The controversy over chemtrails vs contrails is a new area of interest for me. There is so much information saturating the web that I perceive to be disinformation, based purely on what I understand about the modes and practices of the disinformation apparatus, that I steered clear of the subject at first. Yet, after a few more months of discovery, I was drawn back to it because it fits so neatly into the package that is “Control,” the watchword for the American Matrix. Secondly, once I read the Report From Iron Mountain: On The Possibility and Desirability of Peace, I gained both a renewed interest in the subject of weather modification, and a clearer understanding of how it fits firmly into the processes that form their long-range planning apparatus.
FACT: The United States has conducted weather modification as a National Policy as far back as 1967. The attached document is proof of this fact. Technological developments gained over the last five-decades likely yielded an impressive capability at manipulating weather over U.S. territories, or presumable through the use of elevated platforms, modification capability over any micro-climate, or macro-climate system on the globe.
The federal document, A Recommended National Program In Weather Modification provides an undeniable link to the U.S. Weather Modification Programs. I have highlighted some interesting aspects inside the documents, which includes ominous code-names like Project Skyfire, Storm Fury, and Hailswath.
These programs were big ticket research, with at least $382, MILLION dollars allocated in the first three-years. To put that into 2019 perspective, that is about $2.8 BILLION in 2019 dollars. The same $382 Million dollars would have purchase 159 of the highly successful F-4 Phantom II fighter jets (that’s 13 Squadrons of aircraft). Perhaps a better way to imaging the astounding expenditure, the median price of a home in America was $24,700 in 1968.
In line with typical public knowledge of government programs, they always are presented in a positive spin, highlighting the value of these important programs to the welfare of everyday Americans. One thing is for certain however; research on how to produce rain will yield methods that limit rain. Research on how to keep temperatures low, could yield processes that would increase temperatures. It is all a matter of the goals and objectives at the time, and even years or decades after research results were recorded.
What is absolutely clear however, is that the United States was serious it’s weather modification program, and as evidence suggest, that has not changed in the years that followed.
FACT: The United States has conducted weather modification as a National Policy as far back as 1967. The attached document is proof of this fact. Technological developments gained over the last five-decades likely yielded an impressive capability at manipulating weather over U.S. territories, or presumable through the use of elevated platforms, modification capability over any micro-climate, or macro-climate system on the globe.
The federal document, A Recommended National Program In Weather Modification provides an undeniable link to the U.S. Weather Modification Programs. I have highlighted some interesting aspects inside the documents, which includes ominous code-names like Project Skyfire, Storm Fury, and Hailswath.
These programs were big ticket research, with at least $382, MILLION dollars allocated in the first three-years. To put that into 2019 perspective, that is about $2.8 BILLION in 2019 dollars. The same $382 Million dollars would have purchase 159 of the highly successful F-4 Phantom II fighter jets (that’s 13 Squadrons of aircraft). Perhaps a better way to imaging the astounding expenditure, the median price of a home in America was $24,700 in 1968.
In line with typical public knowledge of government programs, they always are presented in a positive spin, highlighting the value of these important programs to the welfare of everyday Americans. One thing is for certain however; research on how to produce rain will yield methods that limit rain. Research on how to keep temperatures low, could yield processes that would increase temperatures. It is all a matter of the goals and objectives at the time, and even years or decades after research results were recorded.
What is absolutely clear however, is that the United States was serious it’s weather modification program, and as evidence suggest, that has not changed in the years that followed.