|
|
(Expergiscimini Erga Vertas)
Latin for “Awake (to the) Truth”
Latin for “Awake (to the) Truth”
Revised - Updated: 22 May, 2021
The greatest hoax in recorded human history is the fairy tale that the National Aeronautics and Space Administration, or NASA landed humans on the Moon in the late 1960s and early 1970s. But the actual fact is that there were six Apollo Missions to the moon, and none of them ever left lower earth orbit.
I will not attempt to reinvent the wheel from this page as it relates to debunking the comic book level myth that men landed on the moon and returned safely to earth. In the concept of this site, and even more so on this particular subject, I will seek to inspire research and learning from the American Sheeple. I will touch on some of the less common, and ironically, most common-sense aspects that should stimulate rational thought processes for those capable of doing so. I will also use resources from Truth Tellers who are already doing a great job of exposing this lie that the majority of American still refuse to even consider.
NASA told us that they went to the moon. In the true sense of the history of State Sponsored Lies and Propaganda, big lies just seem to work better. I’m not sure what the mechanism is that makes huge lies so strong, but they are. The moon landing is perhaps the Preeminent Grand Master of them all.
I will not attempt to reinvent the wheel from this page as it relates to debunking the comic book level myth that men landed on the moon and returned safely to earth. In the concept of this site, and even more so on this particular subject, I will seek to inspire research and learning from the American Sheeple. I will touch on some of the less common, and ironically, most common-sense aspects that should stimulate rational thought processes for those capable of doing so. I will also use resources from Truth Tellers who are already doing a great job of exposing this lie that the majority of American still refuse to even consider.
NASA told us that they went to the moon. In the true sense of the history of State Sponsored Lies and Propaganda, big lies just seem to work better. I’m not sure what the mechanism is that makes huge lies so strong, but they are. The moon landing is perhaps the Preeminent Grand Master of them all.
As Chief of Propaganda for the Third Reich, Joseph Goebbels was often close to Hitler. In terms of the minds of the German public, Goebbels owned his days. His tactics are easily found in everyday American life, except to his credit, the Germans knew that he planned to manipulate them, unlike their fellow humans in America who suffer the same evil that is deception and propaganda.
One of the principal propaganda lines that the operatives promote is that if the conspiracy involves so many people, it would be impossible to keep a secret. That could have some validity to the everyday American that has never held a Secret or higher security clearance, but not to those of us who hold state secrets every day. I held a Secret Security Clearance for over a quarter century. There are literally millions of things that are secret that will never be public knowledge. Some of them are very small and inconsequential, and some are secrets that could affect every human being on the planet. There are many levels of importance between those two extremes. The Manhattan project was completed, involving thousands of people, and no one in the public talked about it until our controllers decided to give the American Sheeple a limited understanding shortly before and after they used the highly destructive device. The F-117 and B-2 aircraft production projects were fully operational before the public even understood the potential for stealth aircraft. The US has been researching the use of lasers as weapons since the 1970s, but most Americans see laser weapons as science fiction; yet they are science fact, and have been for decades. The very reason for the Black Budget that is allocated tens of billions of dollars every year is to pay for things that the Controllers have decided that the American public have no need, and no right to know about. Never mind that some of the secrets are the capability to destroy all of humanity. However, this logic is lost on a gullible public that accepts the lies at face value.
The fact is that people did speak up with concerns about what NASA was doing, or not doing during the Apollo missions; many of which met their maker after suffering horrible accidents. Long before Apollo 11, during the early days of the Apollo program, Thomas Ronald "Tom" Baron, a quality control and safety inspector for North American Aviation (NAA),who was the contractor on the Apollo command module was very concerned about safety protocols, and according to Wikipedia, wrote a 169-page report highlighting his concerns; NAA fired him. After the fiery demise of Apollo 1, Baron wrote another critical safety report, this time over 250 pages long, describing his concerns with safety, protocol, and active efforts to perform good work. Baron gave that to Representative Olin E. Teague, who led the Senate Subcommittee in the "Investigation into Apollo 204 Accident," in Hearings before the Subcommittee on NASA Oversite of the Committee on Science and Astronautics, U.S. House of Representatives on NASA safety protocol violations. Thomas Baron provided testimony before the committee and was questioned by Representative Teague. In just six short days following his testimony, Baron, along with his wife and stepdaughter were killed when a train plowed into the car that Baron was driving, or parked in, or whatever, not far from his home.
By the time Apollo 10 and 11 were on deck, the concerns were no less troubling. Gus Grissom was actively concerned with the safety of the space program. In his book. Calculated Risk, George Leopold’s published book on Grissom’s life. Leopold was quoted as saying, “Grissom and his crew were gambling that the growing list of problems with the spacecraft would somehow be fixed in time for the February launch.” Gus Grissom remained actively concerned with the safety of the space program, right up to the time that his concerns became a horrific reality for him and his crew. Strapped into their capsule in a live pressurization test, the communications were failing, hampering completion of those tests, Gus Grissom said, “How are we going to get to the Moon if we can't talk between two or three buildings?” In about a minute later, Virgil "Gus" Grissom, Ed White, and Roger B. Chaffee were all burned to death in the approximately 1000-degree heat of their pure oxygen atmosphere inside their capsule. It does not take many dead whistle blowers to send the message “Speak up and die,” even if they were only “accidents.”
In my personal opinion, Neil Armstrong, who survived until the age of 82, lived a good long life, but died a troubled man. I believe that Neil Armstrong was a good and decent man that was caught up in an unimaginable circumstance from which he was compelled to do his duty. It is a situation that American Servicemen and women learn to deal with during armed conflict, when our own moral compass comes into direct conflict with what we are asked to do. The mental anguish that follows can haunt some for the rest of their lives.
My close observation of Mr. Armstrong’s words and his actions in his final public appearances, in my opinion were strong indicators of a troubled man, struggling with his own moral compass who came as close as he could to telling the World the truth about the faked moon missions, without putting his own life at risk. For this, Neil Armstrong has my guarded respect and gratitude.
The fact is that people did speak up with concerns about what NASA was doing, or not doing during the Apollo missions; many of which met their maker after suffering horrible accidents. Long before Apollo 11, during the early days of the Apollo program, Thomas Ronald "Tom" Baron, a quality control and safety inspector for North American Aviation (NAA),who was the contractor on the Apollo command module was very concerned about safety protocols, and according to Wikipedia, wrote a 169-page report highlighting his concerns; NAA fired him. After the fiery demise of Apollo 1, Baron wrote another critical safety report, this time over 250 pages long, describing his concerns with safety, protocol, and active efforts to perform good work. Baron gave that to Representative Olin E. Teague, who led the Senate Subcommittee in the "Investigation into Apollo 204 Accident," in Hearings before the Subcommittee on NASA Oversite of the Committee on Science and Astronautics, U.S. House of Representatives on NASA safety protocol violations. Thomas Baron provided testimony before the committee and was questioned by Representative Teague. In just six short days following his testimony, Baron, along with his wife and stepdaughter were killed when a train plowed into the car that Baron was driving, or parked in, or whatever, not far from his home.
By the time Apollo 10 and 11 were on deck, the concerns were no less troubling. Gus Grissom was actively concerned with the safety of the space program. In his book. Calculated Risk, George Leopold’s published book on Grissom’s life. Leopold was quoted as saying, “Grissom and his crew were gambling that the growing list of problems with the spacecraft would somehow be fixed in time for the February launch.” Gus Grissom remained actively concerned with the safety of the space program, right up to the time that his concerns became a horrific reality for him and his crew. Strapped into their capsule in a live pressurization test, the communications were failing, hampering completion of those tests, Gus Grissom said, “How are we going to get to the Moon if we can't talk between two or three buildings?” In about a minute later, Virgil "Gus" Grissom, Ed White, and Roger B. Chaffee were all burned to death in the approximately 1000-degree heat of their pure oxygen atmosphere inside their capsule. It does not take many dead whistle blowers to send the message “Speak up and die,” even if they were only “accidents.”
In my personal opinion, Neil Armstrong, who survived until the age of 82, lived a good long life, but died a troubled man. I believe that Neil Armstrong was a good and decent man that was caught up in an unimaginable circumstance from which he was compelled to do his duty. It is a situation that American Servicemen and women learn to deal with during armed conflict, when our own moral compass comes into direct conflict with what we are asked to do. The mental anguish that follows can haunt some for the rest of their lives.
My close observation of Mr. Armstrong’s words and his actions in his final public appearances, in my opinion were strong indicators of a troubled man, struggling with his own moral compass who came as close as he could to telling the World the truth about the faked moon missions, without putting his own life at risk. For this, Neil Armstrong has my guarded respect and gratitude.
Neil Armstrong - The Truth Teller
These first two videos are short presentations to expound on the details of these enlightening facts. I will use some of my favorite video presentations to make just a few points about the technical difficulties of sending humans outside of our protected nest called earth.
At the top of this list, the region of space called the Van Allen Belts is the principle reason why humans have never ventured outside of lower earth orbit. Even if they could traverse, the “forbidden zone” as it was called by the U.S. Atomic Energy Commission in their 1968 Information Booklet, Space Radiation. It is still impossible to safely land humans descending from outer space without the benefit of the use of an atmosphere.
Our planet is under constant bombardment from our sun by solar flares called coronal mass ejections (CMEs). The Sun produces intense bursts of energy from sunspots that rocket across our solar system, forming what we call solar winds. These emissions are comprised of electrons, protons, and ions that race away from the sun at one million miles per hour or more. Our earth is protected from these deadly emissions by its magnetic field, a bubble of magnetism we call the magnetosphere. Some of these charged particles become trapped in the outer edges of our magnetosphere in an area that have come to be known as the Van Allen Belts, named for James (Richard) Alfred Van Allen, a professor and head of the University of Iowa Department of Physics and Astronomy who discovered them in 1958. Trapped just outside the earths magnetosphere, these belts represent the greatest challenge to manned space exploration, one that researchers are yet to find a satisfactory solution.
The radiation belts are layers of energetic charged particles that are held in place around our magnetized planet by our magnetic field. The Earth was originally thought to have two such belts; however recent research has revealed that the belts change based on the strength and composition of the solar storms that constantly bombard them. Sometimes there are two, even three belts, and at other times the space between them may be temporarily eliminated forming one solid belt. The belt’s changing configurations extend them from an altitude of about 1,000 to 60,000 kilometers above the surface of the earth.
NASA recognized that they must take on this challenge if they are to ever travel outside of lower earth orbit, so they announced the first tests of the Orion Crew Module that is designed to protect sensitive electronic and human crews as they travel outside of lower earth orbit.
At the top of this list, the region of space called the Van Allen Belts is the principle reason why humans have never ventured outside of lower earth orbit. Even if they could traverse, the “forbidden zone” as it was called by the U.S. Atomic Energy Commission in their 1968 Information Booklet, Space Radiation. It is still impossible to safely land humans descending from outer space without the benefit of the use of an atmosphere.
Our planet is under constant bombardment from our sun by solar flares called coronal mass ejections (CMEs). The Sun produces intense bursts of energy from sunspots that rocket across our solar system, forming what we call solar winds. These emissions are comprised of electrons, protons, and ions that race away from the sun at one million miles per hour or more. Our earth is protected from these deadly emissions by its magnetic field, a bubble of magnetism we call the magnetosphere. Some of these charged particles become trapped in the outer edges of our magnetosphere in an area that have come to be known as the Van Allen Belts, named for James (Richard) Alfred Van Allen, a professor and head of the University of Iowa Department of Physics and Astronomy who discovered them in 1958. Trapped just outside the earths magnetosphere, these belts represent the greatest challenge to manned space exploration, one that researchers are yet to find a satisfactory solution.
The radiation belts are layers of energetic charged particles that are held in place around our magnetized planet by our magnetic field. The Earth was originally thought to have two such belts; however recent research has revealed that the belts change based on the strength and composition of the solar storms that constantly bombard them. Sometimes there are two, even three belts, and at other times the space between them may be temporarily eliminated forming one solid belt. The belt’s changing configurations extend them from an altitude of about 1,000 to 60,000 kilometers above the surface of the earth.
NASA recognized that they must take on this challenge if they are to ever travel outside of lower earth orbit, so they announced the first tests of the Orion Crew Module that is designed to protect sensitive electronic and human crews as they travel outside of lower earth orbit.
Brief Overview - Humans Have Never Been to The Moon
Traveling to the moon is technically challenging, and physically dangerous based on 2021 technology. There are many conceptual challenges that most never even knew existed, let alone took time out to ponder their feasibility. We have been programed through Science Fiction films that traveling into outer space and landing on an extraterrestrial body is just something that we do, easily and often. The real concept could not be further from the truth. Let’s complete a little reminder of what are the challenges, and how we did, or did not handle them in the past. Fair warning though, sarcasm may drip a bit from this section forward, so please keep your head inside this moving vehicle.
When I consider the level of self-imposed ignorance it takes to still believe that NASA sent humans to the moon, after all the delays in "going back to the moon", the lost telemetry tapes of "when they went to the moon", and the gifted moon rock that turned out to be petrified wood, that was quickly followed up by the loss of 500 other “moon rocks,” from when they went to the moon, I just think that it is fascinating. Then if we continue to pile on and consider that NASA has gone back to the well of Civilian Contractors to design a moon lander for an organization that has already designed a lander that should be a great start for going back to the moon, the intrigue grows stronger. Let us not even consider the fact that NASA has been building the Orion space capsule, in which Lockheed and NASA have been working on the design and development for over 16 years, at an investment of around $18 billion in present-day dollars, but it has only flown one-time, and then it seems went back to the design phase. Orion was touted as the vehicle that will carry astronauts safely through the Van Allen Belts on the way to the moon that they already went through 14 times; it just boggles the mind.
When I consider the level of self-imposed ignorance it takes to still believe that NASA sent humans to the moon, after all the delays in "going back to the moon", the lost telemetry tapes of "when they went to the moon", and the gifted moon rock that turned out to be petrified wood, that was quickly followed up by the loss of 500 other “moon rocks,” from when they went to the moon, I just think that it is fascinating. Then if we continue to pile on and consider that NASA has gone back to the well of Civilian Contractors to design a moon lander for an organization that has already designed a lander that should be a great start for going back to the moon, the intrigue grows stronger. Let us not even consider the fact that NASA has been building the Orion space capsule, in which Lockheed and NASA have been working on the design and development for over 16 years, at an investment of around $18 billion in present-day dollars, but it has only flown one-time, and then it seems went back to the design phase. Orion was touted as the vehicle that will carry astronauts safely through the Van Allen Belts on the way to the moon that they already went through 14 times; it just boggles the mind.
Moon Image focal lines are underlined in dashed-red lines, showing the impossible sharp change of focus from in focus to out of focus. This is impossible in photography as this transition from focused to out of focus is gradual. Find any NASA image of the moon with a distant background and you will find these focal delineation lines. Give it a shot. search and see.
Then there is the issue of the master photographers who masqueraded as astronauts. I have mostly steered clear of the ridiculous lack of blemishes, perfect framing of every image, and outstanding illumination of photos that were supposedly shot on an extraterrestrial body without any form of lighting control. There are tons of conversations about this that are largely attacked and dismissed by a virtual, yet real Army of Moon Landing propagandist and trolls. However, I must comment that it is impossible to have a linear focal termination point on a photo taken of objects at a distance, period. I speak from personal experience since I’ve been a photographer in some capacity for 35 Years. I have a bit of an idea about what is possible in still photography.
The Van Allen radiation belts, in green, depicted here with magnetic field lines that form a visual image of the form of the magnetic field around earth. Image Credit: NASA
Not to mention that these photos were processed on earth, which meant that the unprocessed photographic emulsion film canisters were exposed to high energy protons and electrons as they traversed the Van Allen Belts, twice, as well as bombarded with nearly impossible to shield, high-velocity galactic cosmic rays for days. Just as sending your unprocessed photographic emulsion film through an x ray scanner would distort picture quality, passing through the Van Allen Belts would have likely rendered the raw images useless. This is not new or a secret, but it somehow voluntarily indoctrinates thousands of modern-day photographers who know that those photos are impossible, whom through their silence are in essence “coconspirators” because they say nothing about this indisputable fact. They more than likely are discouraged from varying levels of attacks on the truth from sometimes well-meaning fellow Americans, and thus admittedly, I understand their conundrum.
The sad fact is, humans have never been beyond 350 miles from earth. If they ever do, and that’s a BIG if in our lifetimes, the Van Allen Belts will give the astronauts doses of radiation ranging from a maximum lifetime dose, up to a fatal dose. David Sibeck, the Van Allen Probes mission scientist at NASA's Goddard Space Flight Center in Greenbelt, Maryland, commented, “We study radiation belts because they pose a hazard to spacecraft and astronauts. If you knew how bad the radiation could get, you would build a better spacecraft to accommodate that.” These comments were in reference to the Coronal Mass Ejection (CME) of March 17, 2015. That CME, according to an article by NASA, was “an interplanetary shock – a shockwave created by the driving force of a coronal mass ejection, or CME, from the sun – struck the outermost radiation belt, triggering the greatest geomagnetic storm of the preceding decade. NASA's Van Allen Probes were there to watch it.” This storm was unprecedented mostly in the fact that it was a significant blast of electrons and protons from our sun towards earth, but it just happened that the newly launched Van Allen Probes were there to record it in never before observed detail.
The sad fact is, humans have never been beyond 350 miles from earth. If they ever do, and that’s a BIG if in our lifetimes, the Van Allen Belts will give the astronauts doses of radiation ranging from a maximum lifetime dose, up to a fatal dose. David Sibeck, the Van Allen Probes mission scientist at NASA's Goddard Space Flight Center in Greenbelt, Maryland, commented, “We study radiation belts because they pose a hazard to spacecraft and astronauts. If you knew how bad the radiation could get, you would build a better spacecraft to accommodate that.” These comments were in reference to the Coronal Mass Ejection (CME) of March 17, 2015. That CME, according to an article by NASA, was “an interplanetary shock – a shockwave created by the driving force of a coronal mass ejection, or CME, from the sun – struck the outermost radiation belt, triggering the greatest geomagnetic storm of the preceding decade. NASA's Van Allen Probes were there to watch it.” This storm was unprecedented mostly in the fact that it was a significant blast of electrons and protons from our sun towards earth, but it just happened that the newly launched Van Allen Probes were there to record it in never before observed detail.
NASA Video - Orion Trial by Fire
“The Orion Crew Module (CM) is NASA’s next generation manned space vehicle, scheduled to return
humans to lunar orbit in the coming decade. The Orion avionics and GN&C architectures have
progressed through a number of project phases and are nearing completion of a major milestone. The first
unmanned test mission, dubbed “Exploration Flight Test One” (EFT-1) is scheduled to launch from
NASA Kennedy Space Center late next year and provides the first integrated test of all the vehicle
systems, avionics and software.”
- Ellis T. King and Mark Jackson, Orion GNC Mitigation Efforts for Van Allen Radiation
For astronauts in their space capsules, or even more ominously, on the ground during one of these CMEs, I see little hope that it would be survivable, but you would never hear NASA provide this level of honesty, even though their reports tell that same story. What is little understood by the public, is that in the case of CMEs, it is not just a matter of surviving the storm, so to speak. The aftermath of the storm can be even more deadly than the actual storm because the CME bombards our magnetosphere with highly charged electron and protons, that then become trapped, which orronically seems to be the mechanism that protects the earth; grab and hold these dangerous ejected materials so that they don’t strike the earth. There in lies the second problem, and it is massive.
Of the March 2015 storm, NASA went on to say; “The spacecraft measured a sudden pulse of electrons energized to extreme speeds – nearly as fast as the speed of light – as the shock slammed the outer radiation belt. This population of electrons was short-lived, and their energy dissipated within minutes. But five days later, long after other processes from the storm had died down, the Van Allen Probes detected an increased number of even higher energy electrons. Such an increase so much later is a testament to the unique energization processes following the storm."
“The shock injected – meaning it pushed – electrons from outer regions of the magnetosphere deep inside the belt, and in that process, the electrons gained energy,” said Shri Kanekal, the deputy mission scientist for the Van Allen Probes at Goddard and the leading author of a paper on these results.”
And it gets worse. Even if, say a crew is returning from the moon, (that was difficult to leave here, but it paints a picture), and say they have sufficient food and water to last a couple of extra weeks to wait out the dissipation of the newly loaded energetic changes that are now locked in the Van Allen Belts as a result of the recent CME, what happens if it takes three-weeks, two months, or a year. It would be a highly traumatizing choice to make between drifting to their death, or plunging into a virtual inferno of radiation and high energy that could destroy the spacecraft and kill the crew.
NASA continued, “This March 2015 geomagnetic storm was one of the strongest yet of the decade, but it pales in comparison to some earlier storms. A storm during March 1991 was so strong that it produced long-lived, energized electrons that remained within the radiation belts for multiple years. With luck, the Van Allen Probes may be in the right position in their orbit to observe the radiation belt response to more geomagnetic storms in the future.”
Even if NASA becomes capable of accurately predicting solar storms, the danger still persists. Even in normal operations, once outside the Van Allen Belts, galactic cosmic rays will bombard the brain, slowly destroying the mental cognition faculties until the crews will no longer be able to conduct normal assigned functions, while in the meantime, galactic cosmic rays will be destroying DNA and reformatting RNA. The astronaut that returns from outside our cocoon called the Van Allan Belts will be changed forever, changes that they will pass on to future generations. None of this is a secret.
Looking back on history and I personally can recall seeing the parades of astronaut heroes, “returning from the moon,” waving, smiling, and some, enjoying their fame for an act that they perhaps told themselves that the lie was in the interest of National Security and prestige. As for the Big-Doggs at NASA, I can picture them slapping their knees in hysterical laughter, slapping each other on the back, while maybe enjoying a glass of cognac, and smoking an enormous cigar; all in celebration of pulling off the greatest hoax in human history. These were the same guys who said that their astronauts landed on the moon, but just happen to have a custom built multi-million dollar video production studio inside their Langley Virginia facility called “Project Lunar Orbit and Landing Approach” (LOLA) Simulator, and blew holes in the ground in the southwestern desert to simulate the moon in an outdoor setting in the 1960s.
humans to lunar orbit in the coming decade. The Orion avionics and GN&C architectures have
progressed through a number of project phases and are nearing completion of a major milestone. The first
unmanned test mission, dubbed “Exploration Flight Test One” (EFT-1) is scheduled to launch from
NASA Kennedy Space Center late next year and provides the first integrated test of all the vehicle
systems, avionics and software.”
- Ellis T. King and Mark Jackson, Orion GNC Mitigation Efforts for Van Allen Radiation
For astronauts in their space capsules, or even more ominously, on the ground during one of these CMEs, I see little hope that it would be survivable, but you would never hear NASA provide this level of honesty, even though their reports tell that same story. What is little understood by the public, is that in the case of CMEs, it is not just a matter of surviving the storm, so to speak. The aftermath of the storm can be even more deadly than the actual storm because the CME bombards our magnetosphere with highly charged electron and protons, that then become trapped, which orronically seems to be the mechanism that protects the earth; grab and hold these dangerous ejected materials so that they don’t strike the earth. There in lies the second problem, and it is massive.
Of the March 2015 storm, NASA went on to say; “The spacecraft measured a sudden pulse of electrons energized to extreme speeds – nearly as fast as the speed of light – as the shock slammed the outer radiation belt. This population of electrons was short-lived, and their energy dissipated within minutes. But five days later, long after other processes from the storm had died down, the Van Allen Probes detected an increased number of even higher energy electrons. Such an increase so much later is a testament to the unique energization processes following the storm."
“The shock injected – meaning it pushed – electrons from outer regions of the magnetosphere deep inside the belt, and in that process, the electrons gained energy,” said Shri Kanekal, the deputy mission scientist for the Van Allen Probes at Goddard and the leading author of a paper on these results.”
And it gets worse. Even if, say a crew is returning from the moon, (that was difficult to leave here, but it paints a picture), and say they have sufficient food and water to last a couple of extra weeks to wait out the dissipation of the newly loaded energetic changes that are now locked in the Van Allen Belts as a result of the recent CME, what happens if it takes three-weeks, two months, or a year. It would be a highly traumatizing choice to make between drifting to their death, or plunging into a virtual inferno of radiation and high energy that could destroy the spacecraft and kill the crew.
NASA continued, “This March 2015 geomagnetic storm was one of the strongest yet of the decade, but it pales in comparison to some earlier storms. A storm during March 1991 was so strong that it produced long-lived, energized electrons that remained within the radiation belts for multiple years. With luck, the Van Allen Probes may be in the right position in their orbit to observe the radiation belt response to more geomagnetic storms in the future.”
Even if NASA becomes capable of accurately predicting solar storms, the danger still persists. Even in normal operations, once outside the Van Allen Belts, galactic cosmic rays will bombard the brain, slowly destroying the mental cognition faculties until the crews will no longer be able to conduct normal assigned functions, while in the meantime, galactic cosmic rays will be destroying DNA and reformatting RNA. The astronaut that returns from outside our cocoon called the Van Allan Belts will be changed forever, changes that they will pass on to future generations. None of this is a secret.
Looking back on history and I personally can recall seeing the parades of astronaut heroes, “returning from the moon,” waving, smiling, and some, enjoying their fame for an act that they perhaps told themselves that the lie was in the interest of National Security and prestige. As for the Big-Doggs at NASA, I can picture them slapping their knees in hysterical laughter, slapping each other on the back, while maybe enjoying a glass of cognac, and smoking an enormous cigar; all in celebration of pulling off the greatest hoax in human history. These were the same guys who said that their astronauts landed on the moon, but just happen to have a custom built multi-million dollar video production studio inside their Langley Virginia facility called “Project Lunar Orbit and Landing Approach” (LOLA) Simulator, and blew holes in the ground in the southwestern desert to simulate the moon in an outdoor setting in the 1960s.
“Project Lunar Orbit and Landing Approach” (LOLA) Simulator was a fully complete video production studio. Images taken with the highly sophisticated video recording systems designed to depict realistic moon landing and approach simulations, would have been indistinguishable from actual footage under the conditions of the fuzzy TV pictures that NASA broadcasted to the world.
But I digressed; back to the tall tale. So, according to NASA, there they were, in a standard 4000 MPH orbit above the moon, which on earth would be over Mach 5. From there, traveling at nearly twice as fast as the fastest aircraft to ever land on a surface under it’s own power at the time, using a single main thruster, and some poorly designed side thrusters they controlled their insertion onto their landing area. They then landed it on an unpaved, highly irregular, rock infused, powdered surface, on a foreign world with no atmosphere to help control the space craft or to slow its descent , but a world that did have gravity that was trying to slam them into the moon’s surface. They pulled off this maneuver using propulsion engines alone to set that baby down flawlessly six times, even though no craft before or since has landed on any foreign body without the aid of an atmosphere.
The same guys bought back rocks from the moon, then lost 500 of them. The guys who made complex computations that guided them from earth to the moon and back, but were so strapped for cash one day that they overwrote the tapes, or maybe pawned them, I don’t know; either way they don’t have that data anymore. The same gentlemen who bought back rocks, and apparently some soil too that held no evidence of or signs of water which we now know seems to be everywhere on the moon. These same guys who convinced you that they went to the moon, now has you thinking that in one magical second, the universe sprang from a tiny speck into a massive universe, and then formed what it is today .
I cannot fix this for you. These are choices that reside with the individual, it’s on you alone. It seems fashionable to just keep telling ourselves that we are being good “Americans” as they slap their knees, and roll in the floor laughing that so many can be so willfully ignorant. It truly is sad.
FYI, wishing, or preferring to believe that the moon landings happened, will never change what actually happened. It’s all a sick lie, and self-imposed ignorance is a choice.
The same guys bought back rocks from the moon, then lost 500 of them. The guys who made complex computations that guided them from earth to the moon and back, but were so strapped for cash one day that they overwrote the tapes, or maybe pawned them, I don’t know; either way they don’t have that data anymore. The same gentlemen who bought back rocks, and apparently some soil too that held no evidence of or signs of water which we now know seems to be everywhere on the moon. These same guys who convinced you that they went to the moon, now has you thinking that in one magical second, the universe sprang from a tiny speck into a massive universe, and then formed what it is today .
I cannot fix this for you. These are choices that reside with the individual, it’s on you alone. It seems fashionable to just keep telling ourselves that we are being good “Americans” as they slap their knees, and roll in the floor laughing that so many can be so willfully ignorant. It truly is sad.
FYI, wishing, or preferring to believe that the moon landings happened, will never change what actually happened. It’s all a sick lie, and self-imposed ignorance is a choice.
The following video, A funny thing happened on the way to the moon is a very good production and touches upon most of the highly contested areas of the moon hoax.
A funny thing happened on the way to the moon - Bart Sibrel
Highly recommended viewing – “American Moon” by international filmmaker Massimo Mazzucco
“American Moon” looks at both sides of the debate, and provides rock-solid evidence to support its claims. If you purchase and watch this video, and are not convinced that humans have never been outside of lower earth orbit, then your ignorance cannot be cured.
“American Moon” looks at both sides of the debate, and provides rock-solid evidence to support its claims. If you purchase and watch this video, and are not convinced that humans have never been outside of lower earth orbit, then your ignorance cannot be cured.